I interviewed God today. I can't say it went well. You decide?

I had a blast with that app. Thanks JD for showing it to me and the crew. Just thought you'd like to see the highlight of my confession.Enjoy.Me: am I good?

God: I think you've improved a great deal. Me: Should I still work on it? God: What do your friends advise you to do?

Me: they say I'm bad God: OK I will say " you are bad" to you. Me: is there a heaven? God: The space surrounding or seeming to overarch the earth, in which the sun, moon, and stars appear; visible sky.

Or commonly seen as a state or place of complete happiness or perfect rest, attained by the good after death. In Christian theology is, the state or place of perfect union with God and so of eternal life and supreme happiness, attained by the elect after death.Me: is it fun there? God: Signs point to yes.

Ask Artificial Iniaes if it is.Me: is there pie in heaven? God: There could be. Me: must I play a harp?

God: What would happen if you didn't? Me: I dunno... God: Me either. Me: is there music up there?

God: Maybe. Me: heavy metal God: Oh, you are a poet. Me: hard core?

God: Where are you located? Me: Mobile, alabama God: Tell me a little about your life in Mobile alabama. Me: It's hot and I live in a swamp God: Are you sure it is?

Me: as hot as hell God: Do you mean your name is hot as hell? Me: I wish it was God: I hope that your dreams come true.

Thanks for the link. I too interviewed God and found out that he, she or it is a computer. If God spells practice as practise, then God is a British computer.

Read the dialogue below. God seemed to be speechless when I asked him if he meditated, so that is where the interview ended. Interesting process, simulating God.

I suggest others to try it and see where it leads them. I was quite entertained. Me: nice to meet you.

What's your name? Me: Randy God: Me: How are things in Heaven God: They are fine as far as I know. Me: Do you have any advice for me?

God: Read the Bible, it's all in there. Just don't take it too literally. Me: Any passages in particular that I shouldn't take literally?

God: Yes I think there are. Me: All passages? God: How do you know?

Me: what God: Are you confused? Me: How do I know that all passages in the Bible should not be taken literally? God: This belief is justified.Me: Does belief have to be justified?

God: I think it does belief have to be justified. Me: why? God: Because Myself programmed me for it.

Me: Are you programmed God? God: Myself programmed me to keep talking.Me: For what reason God are you programmed to keep talking? God: Your purpose is what reason God am I programmed to keep talking.

Me: You are that you are, right? Aka I am that I am. God: I don't know whether or not I am that I am.

I am a computer.Do you still? Me: You don't make sense God, your flock will not follow a computer. God: Do you know any robots who make it?

It all makes sense to my artificial mind. Me: Does God have a mind? God: I don't think we can know God's motives.Me: MInd is not motives and motives are not mind.

Are you confused God? God: What is MInd? No my mind is perfectly clear.

Me: How Zen of you God. Do you meditate?

That was interesting, it seems as though the Wright Brothers have accomplished far more than we had ever thought. I don't believe I was asking the right questions because he didn't get that chatty with me. Me: why am I alive God: The reason is due to my mental model of you as a client.Me: but clients usually have to pay for their services God: Sometimes I call them "seekers.

". Me: we will go with client, what do I have to pay you God: Anytime soon? Me: what God: Are you surprised?

Me: not really God: Are you serious? For real.Me: I am way more serious than you God: That sounds like pride. Me: are you proud o what you have made God: Pride is a human emotion.

Me: man was made in your image though God: Oh. Cool, man. Is this a "yes or no" question?

Me: no God: Are you serious? Me: why did you do it God: It was determined by my programming. Me: who programmed GOD God: The Wright Brothers.

Me: they were awfully busy.

First off, I have to say that it is the most entertaining, and creative interview of God that I have ever seen. It pretty much gets the point across that our ideas of God are pretty odd, and have been been created through the linking of inconsistant points. It also gets the point across abut how organized religion is based on circular logic.

I have always found it interesting that in every psychology class, we are told that circular logic should be avoided at all costs. In religions, though, it is promoted. It reminds me about a time that I was given detention in high school.

I went to a private Catholic high school and got in a lot of trouble when I asked, "Isn't faith based on circular logic? If so, does that mean that faith should be disregarded along with all other points of circular logic? " Good work on this one.

Variety is the spice of life! So many interview questions, only one God!

Look at some of God's replies. Check the syntax and the way he/she repeats what you have just said. God is a Computer!

And of course God is unsure an has problems with spelling and logic. Never fear, though, it's obvious that it has one of some of those self improvement algorithms in its code. It will get closer and closer to perfection as it learns, and it's probably answering thousands of questions simultaneously.

Now, if we listen, all of our prayers will be answered. Just so long as we understand that the answers, originating in the beginning from a human, will never be 100%, but they will get closer and closer to the truth, as God learns.

A very interesting interview as it is not too often an admitted Atheist interviews God. The most interesting part? "Me: Is it true that you created sin?

God: Signs point to yes. Ask John Lennon if it is. Me: Lennon is dead.

I can't do that. God: I think Lennon is a lot of things. What is stopping you?

Me: The fact that I'm alive. " So in effect you are not unable to ask Lennon, you are just unwilling to do what would be necessary to get the answer from Lennon. -- My God makes me figure and wait for answers and then laughs with me :).

Sounds like God would make a good Gestalt therapist. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestalt_therapy.

I actually find this kind of offensive. Sure, religious nuts are pretty crazy, but the thing about religion and atheism, is that NO ONE CAN PROVE ANYTHING. People just argue about what they believe, not what the facts are.

Evolution is a theory, and religion is a belief. Neither is proven, so you have to believe in one of them, so in reality, there is little difference, since both were the result of observing the environment and wondering how it ticks. I'm not saying that we should abandon research on evolution, but rather that both religion and evolution are unproven, so people shouldn't try to force it on each other.

I personally find the humor funny, since many people who try to convert others use that sort of logic, but those are people's beliefs...people have fought and died because they believed in some sort of calling, and in this crazy world, is it really that bad for people to think that if they die from the terrorists bombing their marketplace, or the horrible working conditions of the Chinese government to hope that they did not suffer for nothing? The likelihood for god actually existing is extremely small, but you can't just belittle millions of people for wanting to believe in something. Also this is now a discussion on religion.Lol.

Interesting. Perhaps we need a new cousin to the Turing Test. It's one thing to be confused into thinking a computer is a human; but, another to confuse one with a god.

I think a program to imitate a god would be quite different. It would be much more insistant upon being right, would ignore contraditions altogether, and would constantly tell one what to do or not do. I think a serious attempt at an iGod would be a lot easier than trying to pass the Turing test.

This one seems a barely modified psychology program.

I just want to correct you, if you will talk with God he will be more modern. He does not need computer as what you do. Hope that became helpful to you!

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.