If out sourcing saves us all that money, but takes our jobs where do we get all that money to save?

If out sourcing saves us all that money, but takes our jobs where do we get all that money to save. Asked by Beansie47 1 month ago Similar questions: sourcing saves money takes jobs save Business > Jobs.

Similar questions: sourcing saves money takes jobs save.

Well, you see, you have uncovered the fly in the ointment. Outsourcing does not save "us all" money. It saves money for the companies that outsource their manufacturing and customer service to other countries.

Now, supposedly, these companies are taking the massive amount of profit and creating jobs here. However, they aren't. They are hiding all the trillions in profit they are saving by outsourcing and paying slave wages, and hiding it in offshore accounts, waiting until they get a tax break on it.

And they are counting of the GOP to give them that tax break. They have no interest, and have no evidence of , ever creating jobs here, and the trickle down theory has proven to be a shell game. It's been almost 12 years, and it hasn't happened.To sum it up, the one percent and the big corporations are getting richer on the backs on the common working guy - like you and me.

As for why some working class are in favor of continuing this - who knows.

If we don't have jobs and can't afford the big screen tvs the Chinese make or the services call centers in India (who I can hardly understand anyway) call about, there goes their jobs too. Education is priced out of reach or takes 20 years to pay off. There are not enough jobs at the top for everyone and not all people are made to be entrepreneurs and innovators but still deserve and are willing to work to make a decent living.

Seems like if the rich get richer its called free enterprise but if the middle class wants a piece of the American dream, its labeled socialism, wealth redistribution, and class warfare. Beansie47 1 month ago .

The key is to decide what we do well and keep those jobs and outsource the jobs we do not want to do. Thus we have a higher educated work force that invents, plans and supervises and let the other workers do the simple jobs that they can do. However that means we must educate all of our workers and spend to keep them well trained.

That's the question they don't want you to ask. TurboB has pointed out exactly what the fallacy in that argument is. Outsourcing only increases the profit margin for the management.

Multinational corporations that are positioned to exploit, er, capitalize on a global workforce and emergent technology. Bottom line: if you work from a cubicle or a home computer, be afraid. Be very afraid.

Someone in the Ukraine or Bangalore is willing to do your job for pennies on the dollar without benefits. We need to re-train our workforce and lower the cost of education, both which are going to take not months or years, but decades.

SHHHHHHHHH. You're not supposed to tell everyone the loophole in their cunning plan! .

Outsourcing is going to happen-- the economics are compelling. Folks in India and China and Mexico are more than willing to work for $1.25 an hour and no benefits. There is no way for US workers to compete directly against that.

You just have to get used to that. Twenty years ago you could get a good-paying job that required no skills at all- I worked with guys that (slowly) schlepped boxes in a warehouse, and they all had big brand new hot rods. Also guys that operated punch-presses.

But now most of those jobs have gone to places where the labor costs are a small fraction of what they are here. Those jobs are not coming back. The only reason we had those golden years 1950 to 1995 roughly, was because India and China and most of Asia had really rotten economic systems-- they did not engage in your basic capitalist system.

That was a nice deal for our unskilled labor market. But it was unsustainable once the rest of the world woke up and realized they could stamp out widgets too and make a profit and ship them here and still undercut the US providers by 60%. So we have to adjust.

We have to do smarter things, things that guys right off the farm in China can't do. That's going to take a bit of learnin, so it would be nice if schools were getting some attention, too bad they're not.

What are the best part time jobs that actually can amke decent money.

Outsourcing is going to happen-- the economics are compelling. Folks in India and China and Mexico are more than willing to work for $1.25 an hour and no benefits. There is no way for US workers to compete directly against that.

You just have to get used to that. Twenty years ago you could get a good-paying job that required no skills at all- I worked with guys that (slowly) schlepped boxes in a warehouse, and they all had big brand new hot rods. Also guys that operated punch-presses.

But now most of those jobs have gone to places where the labor costs are a small fraction of what they are here. Those jobs are not coming back. The only reason we had those golden years 1950 to 1995 roughly, was because India and China and most of Asia had really rotten economic systems-- they did not engage in your basic capitalist system.

That was a nice deal for our unskilled labor market. But it was unsustainable once the rest of the world woke up and realized they could stamp out widgets too and make a profit and ship them here and still undercut the US providers by 60%. So we have to adjust.

We have to do smarter things, things that guys right off the farm in China can't do. That's going to take a bit of learnin, so it would be nice if schools were getting some attention, too bad they're not. Ancient_Hacker 46 months ago.

SHHHHHHHHH. You're not supposed to tell everyone the loophole in their cunning plan! Danielpauldavis 51 months ago.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.