If the delegates of 50 states nominated Ron Paul, would the GOP change the rule to 57?

I think they'll nominate Mitt....one way or another. First, I disagree that he won't get enough delegates. Many of the states left are not "winner take all".

He'll be 2nd in most of those elections....giving him delegates. He's got a good chance to get enough delegates. Second, do you think Mitt and his supporters are going to sit quietly by at the convention and let someone else take the nomination?

After he's spent $millions and thousands have voted for him? Unless one of the other candidates suddenly makes a surge and wins as many delegates as Mitt, he should and (I think) will be the candidate. Third, who's gonna be the candidate?

All the heavy weights that I'm familiar with (Jeb Bush, Chris Cristie) have said they're waiting until 2016. Looking at trying to put together a winning campaign, raising money, hiring staffers, putting local campaigns together all over the country, is a pretty daunting task. If Jeb Bush (for example) jumps in at that point, he knows his chances aren't good to win.

In modern politics, you don't get many second chances. Why wouldn't he wait until 2016 when the White House is empty and he's got time to establish his campaign?

They will choose the Flip_Flop. He is so not genuine. Mitt Romney.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.