And businesses and the 'job creators' have enjoyed almost 10 years of tax incentives, thanks to the Bush tax cuts. So where are all these jobs they would 'create' if only they were given the right incentives? The truth is no tax break ever was the reason for a business to hire more employees.
Demand for your goods or services dictates increased hiring, nothing else.
Some tax breaks are already in place like those. You just need to weigh the new jobs vs. the lost revenue due to taxes not collected from jobs that would be created regardless of the tax break.
No, and smart business poeple DO NOT expand business in hopes of beating their competition to the punch....that's called speculation, not business. The idea that tax breaks will encourage business to hire is just crazy. What needs to be done is what Henry Ford did.
He paid his workers enough money so they could afford to buy what they manufactured....in other words, he built his own middle class. Without the middle class making enough money to buy what businesses make and sell, there will never be a thriving economy. The economy is not built by wealthy "job creators", it's built by the middle class purchasing what the wealthy create.
If the middle class is well off enough to purchase, then all classes are more successful. Why don't the wealthy like Romney and his cronies get that?
Correct. Demand creates jobs, not tax cuts. Similarly, companies don't lay off because of having to pay tax.
They would be "happy" to pay tax if there was demand and therefore profit. The bottom line is that Romney is full of crap when he says taxes reduce job creation.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.