If you were the trapped Chilean miner whose wife and mistress met while waiting for his rescue, what would you be thinking about the rescue?

If I were that trapped miner, I would consider my love-life a second priority. Getting out alive is the primary focus in life-treathening situations, and sexaul activity is defintely less important. Apart from that, I think this problem will sort itself out long before that miner will re-surface.

Both the wife and mistress have about three months to either settle this issue together, without the miner's involvement, and can decide for themselves whether they want any thing to do with him or not. If given the chance, I am very sure he will have a great story, explaining why he had a mistress. That's a talent all cheaters seem to have in common: a talent to make up plausible stories.

However, as said, I don't think he will get the chance this time. I think both women will have made up their minds long before he re-surfaces.

If I were that trapped miner, I would consider my love-life a second priority. Getting out alive is the primary focus in life-treathening situations, and sexaul activity is defintely less important. Apart from that, I think this problem will sort itself out long before that miner will re-surface.

Both the wife and mistress have about three months to either settle this issue together, without the miner's involvement, and can decide for themselves whether they want any thing to do with him or not. If given the chance, I am very sure he will have a great story, explaining why he had a mistress. That's a talent all cheaters seem to have in common: a talent to make up plausible stories.

However, as said, I don't think he will get the chance this time. I think both women will have made up their minds long before he re-surfaces...

I wouldn't care about anything except getting out alive. On the way up think who you are going to run to. That will let the other one know.

Maybe after three months the mistress will have someone new. And if your wife looks mad step away from the edge of the hole. Lol.

In some countries, it might be acceptable: " “It’s a rather serious book based on interviews, not just hearsay,” said Patrick Jarreau, one of the editors of Le Monde, though the book does circulate old rumors that the authors say cannot be confirmed. €œSex and politics seven months ahead of a presidential election — that’s a pretty good recipe for success. € The book’s central premise is that in France, a successful politician is also a seductive politician.

Sex, the authors say, is a civic imperative. €œFar from being a flaw, to cast yourself in the role of seducer is without doubt an important quality in our political life,” the book claims. Certainly, power attracts.

When Edgar Faure became prime minister in the 1950’s, he gained the lofty title of “president of the Council,” and that apparently made all the difference. €œWhen I was a minister, some women resisted me,” he once was quoted as saying. €œOnce I became president, not even one.

€ France’s president from 1895 to 1899, Félix Faure, who was not related, died in the bed of his mistress. De Gaulle was the only post-World War II French leader to maintain a strict military discipline over his personal life, the book asserts. More recently, it adds, Mr. Giscard d’Estaing, Mr. Mitterrand and Mr. Chirac juggled the demands of the state, their families and their extracurricular activities with aplomb.

" It was never a secret about Mitterand or Chirac.

Since this is an unforeseen circumstance that he has no control over, there is nothing he can do. It must be flattering to have two women so concerned about him, so when he gets out he will have to sort things out. Will they both be so mad that they will reject him?

This may be a test of the most enduring love. Which will stick by him? I hope they all make it out alive.

France’s president from 1895 to 1899, Félix Faure, who was not related, died in the bed of his mistress. De Gaulle was the only post-World War II French leader to maintain a strict military discipline over his personal life, the book asserts. More recently, it adds, Mr. Giscard d’Estaing, Mr. Mitterrand and Mr. Chirac juggled the demands of the state, their families and their extracurricular activities with aplomb.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions