If you were Vince, would you scrap Wade vs Taker to do Sting vs Taker at WM 27?

1). If he was it would seriously be a lot like the Modern Day Ministry. http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind... in there you can see valid points, if Vince was the true leader he would be the "Higher Power".

That sounds familiar... oh right, Ministry of Darkness! 2) Chris Jericho and Edge didn't have a match that lived up to hopes, so Cena and Jericho would be worse. Plus Cena has been burying Jericho since 2005.

3) I don't understand what you mean? Sting won't be at WM? 4) Ezekiel Jackson will put on another Mark Henry match with Undertaker.

Mark Henry is so slow in the ring, he can't even win a race against Nexus when he's about 30 metres ahead: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSvDKIc0e... I mean WTF? Put Ezekiel Jackson in Henry's place in that video, or any video, and that's the type of match you get. 5) I see what you mean, at WrestleMania it would be a bad idea, it's just stupid and pathetic to be on The Streak 3 times... 3?

God, you may as well quit if you lose 3 PPV's in a row (like Batista did... duct tape, pfft). 6) Goldberg would want to win, and I'm betting he certainly isn't being paid $2 Million to make a WrestleMania feud, then lose his only return match at WrestleMania (plans for Lesnar, but Dana White won't let him go). 7) Sorry, but Vince's status?

He has a 0-4 win/loss record at the event. He has 1 victory over Undertaker due to Kane's interference. During that match Vince got busted open as soon as the match started.

He only has credibility due to his gimmick and his pull backstage, but also on camera with his money. There is a LOT of hate because Wade isn't a very liked superstar. Firstly, he doesn't have the look.

1) He has superman hair. 2) He has disproportionate legs. 3) He doesn't have an intimidating look to overcome any 'fears' he could have of Undertaker.

4) His look doesn't build him as a force who could take out Undertaker, with that said Kane (1998) was the best looking superstar, and most plausibly looking superstar to end the streak. In that gimmick it would make sense. Undertaker vs Mark Henry didn't receive much hate because, to be honest, people didn't care about it.

When the match started, this was how the arena reacted... Somebody gonna get their a** kicked~ Crowd: ..... Doooong~ Crowd: WOOOOOOOOAAAAAAHHYYEAAAH! During the match, Crowd: mmhhhmmph yeaaahh... ehhh. They only reason they must've cheered at the end was because they could get to another match (and 14-0).

That's if Vince wakes up from his coma before and soon.. If he does, I would definately prefer MrMcMahon to face Undertaker at WM in the street fight, it could have interference from Wade.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.