In light of Tilikum the Killer Whale, are the educational (or other) benefits of zoos worth keeping animals in captivity?

Animals that require lots of space or are migratory (whales) shouldn't be kept in small living areas. Endangered species who cannot survive in the wild due to habitat loss or poaching can find safety in zoos which help species survival through breeding programs. Educationally I doubt the effectiveness of keeping wild animals in zoos (although the San Diego Wild Animal Park is a very nice facility).

Domesticated animals, farm animals, insects, reptiles, amphibians, etc. Can teach much about the natural world and animals without keeping larger mammals in captivity. The cost and benefits can be framed as a moral issue. Are animals for our entertainment or should they be given protection and freedom?

I side with the latter, although again zoos can play a role in studying some species behavior and protecting them as well.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.