Is it mainly the moral majority type right wing christians who complain that 'global warming' is a religeon?

LOL! It sure seems so! If they wanted to engage in intelligent discussion, avid deniers would offer scientific evidence to support their position instead of insulting babble about global warming "religion", "hoaxes", "liberals" (oh, what a scary label), and Al Gore.

The science has nothing to do with any of that scare tactic garbage. Of course I'm not referring in any general way about "conservatives" (I am one, when there's a conservative party not discarding our Bill of Rights) since many key climate scientists such as Dr. James Hansen are conservatives: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/?qid=2… I'm also not referring to thoughtful skeptics, since testing and refining scientific theories is exactly how scientific understanding moves forward. The current counterproductive CO2 "solutions" proposed by politicians deserve the most skepticism (as Dr. Hansen eloquently points out).

This is far more complex than the more.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.