Is it plausible or probable that tea bag Libertarianism mirrors endowed fascism?

Having been a Libertarian for many years, I can tell you that smaller government and less public spending would restore far more freedoms than our current government, Republican or Democrat. Fascist governments aren't known for restoring individual freedoms.

Fascism: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.

Libertarians don't want centralized government. Nor do they want a dictator. The individual and individual rights are held as more important than the nation...as it was envisioned by our forefathers.

It's obvious you don't understand your terms...or how Libertarians differ from those on the current Tea Bag bandwagon, many of whom still want government entitlements while denying entitlements to others.

Your question is idiotic on several levels.

Tea bag", a term pejoratively applied to the tea party movement by the cutesy trendy no-brain left, is from the term teabagging, meaning to place one's gonads into another's mouth for sexual pleasure.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.