Scientist have proved that we use .012% of our brain while animals(chimps) use 100% of their brains capacity yet evolutions ignore this and say that human have evolved up from animals, if that was the case then your scenario about digressing would be correct. DNA was a big shocker to science and noted scientist still not believing in a creator admits that DNA would lean more to creation than evolving. There's things that science can't do and every time they mess with life their experience fails in death of its subjects.
They can't make one change to DNA & where there has been cross overs (horse/donkey=mule) they can't reproduce its kind as the Bible says with creation all reproduces its own kind. Science has shown the Bible to be correct yet they still cling to their theory of evolution and one of the main reasons why is because they compare their findings to what Christendom preaches not knowing that Christendom's clergy are really Satan's agents by false teachings. Science along with historians have uncovered the pagan rituals that flourished before the founding of Christianity, they see that those that proclaim to be Christians today have the same pagan festivals as they had back in Babylon.
They fail to examine the scriptures to see that in prophecy Jehovah by means of His only begotten Son has established a Kingdom(Dan 2:44) and that Kingdom will end Satan's system(2 Corinthians 4:4) and as you mentioned where death will be no more and all will have what Adam lost, "PERFECTION"! (Rev 21:3-4).
It's all evolution- evolution doesn't have a direction or a goal, so any accumulation of mutations whether beneficial or deleterious is evolution. There is no reason to believe some mythical figure has anything to do with DNA. Oh, and for the record- we AREN'T saying that the human genome is "deteriorating".
And accumulation of junk DNA supports evolution, kiddo. It's basically what proves common descent. Sorry about your luck- trying to pretend you understand genetics and relate it to god doesn't help your case, as it's provably incorrect.
<------scientist.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.