After the debate she admitted that Romney was correct! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=athcyCTnT... So apparently her facts weren't facts!
She was wrong and I feel it was a set up. I'm pretty disgusted with her as moderator as I don't feel she did it honestly and with integrity. I watched the previous debate and the VP debate and even if I think the VP moderator was biased, I feel she tried somewhat.
This woman Candy was truly in Obama's corner. I don't know who is moderator for Monday's debate, but I hope it is someone with more character than this woman displayed. Why is our country allowing people from the media to moderate debates?
I have wondered about that this year. I'm thinking we should utilize members of our supreme court for this role, people who are judges and are supposed to be very fair minded. I would like to see that.
I would also like to see pre-approved questions submitted and then arbitrarily drawn out of a hat or something like that. I truly feel Candy knew the questions up front and that Obama knew them as well, such a creepy feeling of injustice.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.