I'm not surprised that the idiot believed that, despite the fact that the target of the bombings could not have been anything BUT the civilians, and there was no attempt to target legitimate military or political figures or forces. How could he have had time to scrible that? Dude...did you not watch the whole thing?
He had hours to think about what he wanted to say, he had the motivation of believing that he would not survive to be captured, or that the police would simply shoot him dead, and he had plenty of time to actually write. I don't see anything strange or suspicious in it.
Of course it is a conspiracy. Nobody would blow up the end of a marathon. I made that deduction five minutes after it happened.
Pure nonsense. As for who did it, I believe it was Craft International and a disaster-preparedness simulation team that might even be located in Boston. As for why they tried to pass it off as a real national tragedy, that is strange.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.