Once Prince Charles becomes King & Camilla becomes Queen Consort...?

Discover How To Stop The Daily Pain And Heart Wrenching Suffering, Put An End To The Lying, Face The Truth About Your Marriage, And Create A New, Peaceful, Harmonious And Joyous Marriage Get it now!

I answered this question yesterday,so I am copying it. But I must first correct an answer. This is not a morganatic marriage.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;... Since I've answered this question several times,I am copying an older answer: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;... I've answered this question recently: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;... Philip was not the HEIR to the throne. Elizabeth was heir to her father,George VI's throne. Husbands do not take the titles of the wives.In the UK this means that the husband of a Queen Regnant,the monarch in charge, can not be known as king or king consort,a precedent set up by Victoria.

The spouse of a Queen Regnant is known as a Prince Consort. This spares confusion for those people who don't know the difference between a consort and a regnant;people tend to see only the word king and mistakenly identified the spouse of a monarch queen as the monarch. Philip is of royal birth,but he gave up foreign titles to become a UK citizen.

First he was made HRH,Duke of Edinburgh,Earl Merioneth,Baron Greenwich by George VI. Elizabeth returned Philip's princely title with a British one after she became Queen. Source(s): Philip and Elizabeth by Gyles Brandreth Majesty by Robert Lacey And here is this one that I answered : http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;… Best Answer - Chosen by Asker Philip was not HEIR TO THE THRONE.

He is a spouse of a QUEEN REGNANT. Elizabeth II was heir to the throne of her father,George VI.In the UK,the tradition set forth by Queen Victoria is for the husbands of Queen Regnants to be Prince Consorts. This spares confusion for those who don't understand the difference between a regnant and a consort.To the uninformed,they see the word "King" and they think this is the man in charge,neglecting the fact that he is King CONSORT,or just a spouse.

King is seen as a higher ranking title than Queen and this just won't do when the highest ranked royal and Head of State and Head of Nation is a Queen Regnant. Some people make a huge mistake thinking that Philip's place of birth has something to do with his not being king. Philip's being born in Greece has nothing to do with his not being King.

Philip is second/third cousin to his wife;he is a royal prince by birth. He was also way down the list of succession for the UK throne. He wasn't the heir to the throne.

Men do not assume titles of their wives and must have titles created for them if the monarch so wishes to do so. And in the UK,the traditional title for the spouse of a Queen Regnant is Prince Consort.

Because Kate will become Queen Consort not Queen Regnant. The tradition in this country is that the husband of a Queen Regnant is a Prince. There is only one example of a King Consort in British History - Lord Darnley, the husband of Mary I of Scotland (aka Mary, Queen of Scots) was known as King of the Scots.

Mary I of England was married to Philip II of Spain so he kept his title and Mary II and William II were joint monarchs.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions