No wonder she got mad. It had nothing to do with Bill Clinton's diplomatic puttering, which all the ex-presidents do when they can. What she was mad about was the apparent assumption that as a woman her opinion didn't count as much as her husband's.
I heard a few different reactions to this on the way home last night. Apparently the translator didn't *exactly* nail the syntax of the question correctly ("lost in translation"), and her reaction was to be expected with the context of the trip. I dunno, just sounds like she had a bad day.
It was not lary Clinton's fault the question had lost in translation. Did she even had a clue, what the question really was? I think, if some one ask the question about what Mr. Clinton's opinion about something, then, yes she has the right to give that answer.
I don't think, it was because she was having a bad day.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.