Hello! "The evolution (...) is not only attacked by fundamentalist Christians. It is also challenged by reputable scientists.
Disagreements are increasingly large among paleontologists, fossil experts. " The theory of evolution is a reaction against the clergy and religion, and poor compréhenssion laws of genetics. It is true that living things adapt to their environment, but in no case they become another species.
It is scientifically impossible. The theory of evolution came at a time when science took the place of religion. That's why creationists then we create a movement in response to changes.
But the creationists are wrong too, because the land have not been around 6000 years. It is humanity that has existed for 6000 years. In addition, the creation was not built in 6 days 24 hours, but in six days (periods) of several thousand years.
Nevertheless, it is totally true to believe that Adam and Eve are the ancestors of all humanity, because humans are homo sapiens from the beginning. Adam and Eve are the parents of mankind, and monkeys are not their ancestors, or their cousins. Evolution is it scientifically proven?
This defines the "scientific method" Look what is happening, based on your observations, formulate a theory that could be accurate; put it to the test by further observations and experiments, see if predictions based on your theory is true. Is this followed the approach taken by those who support and teach evolution? Astronomer Robert Jastrow says: "To their chagrin scientists can not provide clear-cut answer, because chemists have never succeeded in reproducing nature's experiments on the creation of life from inert material.
Scientists do not know how it happened. " Evolutionist Loren Eiseley acknowledged: "Having criticized theologians rely on myth and miracle, science found himself in the sad duty to create a new mythology, that is to say, to assume that this a long effort could not happen today happened to the genesis of the world. " A British magazine notes that "a growing number of scientists, including evolutionists, (...) argue that Darwin's evolutionary theory is not a truly scientific theory.
(...) Many of these criticisms are equipped with solid credentials.
You do not understand science, there is overwhelming evidence for evolution, that is why it is the most prominent theory. This is not the lazy answer. Also, the Earth was formed by Nebular Theory, look it up somtime.
Evolution does not explain the origins of life, merely how it has progressed. Obviously though, you are so drowned and comfortable in your ignorance that you shall stay there. So do us all a favor and go to the R&S section, this is SCIENCE.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.