The docs look at your explanation for the injury. They decide if the mechanism of injury and your story match up. If they do, and you can prove it happened while on duty, then your claim should be approved.
If they don't, then your claim is denied. Either way, with your symptoms, you're out of the Army. The fact that you didn't go to sick call when it happened is going to be a huuuge strike against you.
As NG, the burden of proof is on YOU to prove that the injury occurred on active duty.
No. The question assumes that Kano wants to understand statistics, or climate change, or anything at all that doesn't confirm his uninformed erroneous delusions about science and how it works. Deniers do not want to understand anything that might contradict their denial.
If he or any other science-hater vaporizes this answer (as many thousands of pro-science answers have been vaporized here in recent years), I will repost it.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.