Planned Parenthood vs. Soylent Green...which is more ghoulish?

Actually, the "perfect example of liberal hypocrisy", is OWS becoming angry because the homeless people are eating 'their' food (food that was donated to them) OWS is supposed to be about 'sharing the wealth', but as soon as they get some, they don't want to share. They are saying that they shouldn't have to 'work' so many hours to give to people who aren't contributing (ironic, huh?)...They said that they will only serve rice, beans and peanut butter and jelly, instead of the organic chicken and vegetables, spaghetti bolognese, and roasted beet and sheep’s-milk-cheese salad that they serve themselves, in an attempt to make the homeless go away...They don't understand that the homeless are VERY happy to have rice, beans and peanut butter and jelly, because they aren't spoiled like OWS OWS has said that the homeless are invading 'their park', and they are especially having trouble (thefts, assaults) in the 'southwest section of Zuccoti Park', so they may have to put a barricade on that border...They may also come up with a system that identifies who the 'real protestors' are, so that the homeless will not be allowed in and will not be served...Border control on the southwestern border and ID verification to determine who should legitimately receive benefits. OWS has also created their own 'security force' to 'keep the peace', search tents for 'outsiders' and to look for stolen property (that has been a huge issue)...They don't have a 4th amendment, apparently.

To the homeless (who were there first), the OWS are the fat cats who refuse to share with the little guy (the poor). 'Occupy Wall Street' Takes A Stand Against Pretend Protesters http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/28... Occupy Wall Street food servers get sick of the "professional homeless people." "They know what they’re doing." http://althouse.blogspot.com/2011/10/occ... Occupy Wall Street kitchen staff protesting fixing food for freeloaders http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manha...

If they weren't hypocrites, they would let illegal immigrants into their homes and keep their front doors unlocked at night. If an intruder entered, they would apologize for his upbringing in a kapitalist society that made him that way in the first place. They would let all the Gitmo prisoners free because terrorists are just innocent freedom fighters.

They would walk instead of drive. They would live in pine cone houses and not read books because the kill trees. They would sell themselves into slavery as reparation for their ancestors owning slaves.

They wouldn't watch FOX news.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.