Sceptics say that "the dead are incapable of communicating with the living because they are not conscious of anything that happens on the earth" What is a rejoinder to that argument?

A sceptic will never accept, understand or believe in the afterlife until they receive their own personal proof of it via their own senses. I should know, I was one of them once! Until someone they loved or cared for who has passed to spirit gives 100% unequivocal proof to them directly (no mediums involved) that they exist in another form of energy then I cannot convince any of them, nor do I want to.

It is not my place or purpose to convince or convert anyone, if they don’t want to believe that is fine by me and is their choice. A healthy dose of scepticism is required to stay grounded in this line of work anyway, so sceptics don't bother me as long as they are open minded! A medium will never be able to convince a sceptic because there is always a chance in the sceptic's mind that the medium may have “obtained the ... more.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions