I don't think the people who're disagreeing with you have actually read the article. For example, the "why was there climate change in the 14th century, huh, huh, huh?" guy. "No possible natural phenomenon could have caused the huge rise in temperatures ***experienced in last half-century***" EXPERIENCED IN THE LAST HALF-CENTURY.
Basic reading skills, people. Basic reading skills.
I still have a lot of questions before I accept this new study. And I am getting conflicting answers. So until all of my questions are answered in a non-biased manner, I am going to do not one thing they ask me to do to combat global warming.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.