There was much wrong with the response to Katrina, from the strength of the levee in the first place, not being built to stronger standards to the lack of response in the immediate aftermath of the flood. To the inexperienced person Bush put in as head of FEMA, who had no idea of what to do, to the fact that FEMA had been put under Homeland Security, when, as an emergency response you need immediate ability to activate programs. The governor and the mayor are the first places you look when a state gets hit.
Not the White House. In both cases their response was poor. Then DC.
That response was nonexistent. In the aftermath no level of government took themselves in hand fast enough to provide help and food. The President seemed almost unaware of the extent of the damage the broken levee caused.
In the rebuilding you have another problem. Not everything is supposed to be fixed or paid for by Washington. They might take care of some things, but others like individual homes, or local streets aren't something they are supposed to do, and Louisiana is a poor state.
Throwing around baseless charges like fleecing the public doesn't make your case stronger. This was mismanagement, and unpreparedness, not fleecing by the White House, and I'm no fan of Bush.
Actually the government response to Katrina, was the fastest response to a hurricane in american history pretty much everything negative reported from mew orleans was made up fabrications the fault in katrina, was the governors and mayors fault for not ordering an evacusation like everyone else did and letting the emergency responders all flee the city.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.