SQL Server Compatibility with older DotNetNuke versions?

Because of the large installed base and wide variety of environments, the DNN core team has focused on using very standard SQL and I think if there was any problem, your searching would have turned something up.

Because of the large installed base and wide variety of environments, the DNN core team has focused on using very standard SQL and I think if there was any problem, your searching would have turned something up. Also, I'm not aware of any breaking changes or features in SQL Server 2000 that were removed in SQL Server 2005. You should be fine.

If you do run into a problem it's much more likely to be with a 3rd party module rather than the core. Some 3rd party modules were much quicker to begin to use the new capabilities of SQL Server 2005 and in general are less likely to follow standards or be tested as extensively in a wide variety of environments.

I am running 2.1.2 on SQL Server 2005 without issues. I think that the same would be true of 2.0.4.

– Frank K Krivak Aug 17 '11 at 16:33 Service Pack 2, but after checking I remembered that I have since moved the database to SQL Server 2008. So I was running it on SQL Server 2005 SP2, without issues. – notandy Aug 18 '11 at 14:12 Thanks for the info (You too EfficionDave).

I've passed it up the chain and it looks like they are going to start running some sandbox tests now. We just needed a sanity check. – Frank K Krivak Aug 22 '11 at 15:45.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.