After reading the bio that I've cited in sources, I'd say he was a good prime minister. He realized that Canada's interests may not always be in line with that of Great Britain, thus Canada should have more autonomy. This was a change from the way he though before he became prime minister.
So I think that showed that his thinking was rigid, but rather he was able to see the big picture & do what was best for his country & his people. More.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.