What are some GOOD scientifically based arguments AGAINST evolution?

That species do go extinct (dodo, moa, others) that fossils show a distinct trend to complexity (vegetation is the best, from algae to deciduous trees) that DNA is consistent across many species that the earth has been around longer than 6000 or so years Creation suggests that this should not happen Creationism may argue that abiogenesis can't be demonstrated, but evolution is about after that happened.

Sorry for mistakes, I'm no native speaker, I'm german. Well, the evolution theory has a logical base. The creationists have like their name supposes a created theory based on the bible.

Creationists have to avoid any contradictions with their religion so they are not independent in creating their theories. The bible is more or less a collection of fairy tales that only happen in the writers minds. Creationism is not based on science, it's based on simple wishfulnes.

Evolution theory is only dependant on simple logic.so if creationism is based on a simple believe, how can they prove a single thing? Creationists often argue that evolution on its own could never produce so many different kinds of organisms. But what they forget/ignore/deny is that evolution is a process that started billion years ago.

Noone can in any relation pretend what 3 billion years mean. 3 billion years is probably enough time to construct such a variety of organisms by bigger and smaller mutations and genetic variations. The steps from a single cell to those high developed complex organisms like we are are based on a lot of research and no single hint for intelligent design could ever be found.

The evolution theory cannot prove that extreme mutations are caused by evolution (just because some hundred years are nothing compared to 3 billion years of development, so it's not unlikely that nothing special has happened during that time) but nevertheless creationists have neither a single hint or indication that intelligent design made anything like that possible. All physical laws prove that it's impossible to create something from nothing. Why should god create virusses that noone can benefit from?

Just for fun or what? But fossils of so many animals and plants show their development. This is already proven by figuring out how old the fossils are.

Radiocarbon dating is the key word. No creationist can disprove that. These are facts, no belief, irrefutable truth.

So if god was such a intelligent being, why would it take him billion years to develop so many different animals, plants, bacteria, virusses and so on? He couldn't do that in six days, this simply doesn't make sense. And if he really did that he would have made a much easier equilibrium of organisms, not such a complex construction of millions of different organisms.

It's complete nonesense. Because otherwise we wouldn't have found so many fossils of older extinct organisms and no fossils of human beings with that age. If god would really care abouth anything on this earth why the hell does he let us conduct war, why doesn't he help people in need, why does he let us do whatever we want?

So many questions and so many poor answers. None of these organisms that live on our planet are perfect. They all have found more or less good strategies to survive.

It's an ever lasting competition. There are so many adjustments of organisms according to their current enemies and to their current location, climate, whatever. If an animal develops a new habit or a new/different function it simply might increase the chance of reproduction and as time goes by in the log run the best strategies/adjustments will last while others may be eradicated.

And the species homo sapiens is simply so powerful that he can eradicate so many different species if we want to. God wouldn't do anything against it. So why would he create all this stuff, then send Jesus to us, let him be killed and never ever care about us again?

Actually there are so many more arguments against creationism because this theory is based on beliefs, lies and religious propaganda. It's impossible to persuade a creationist from the opposite because if he is dumb enough to believe what the bible tells him without even thinking you also cant expect him to rationally think about evolution. All of their thiniking is intended to somehow destroy your thesis and they also created a mental barrier so that no argument can ever shock their fundamental theories.

"Thand god" there are only few creationism supporters here in Germany. Well, my reply might be a little to long for your purpose, but four sentences are simply not enough to give you a good foundation for debating.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.