Some of the negative consequences that have been postulated by some organizations and some scientists, if global warming increases, are: Flooding, drought, fires, tsunamis and other nature events of magnitude Many species of wildlife will risk to be lost forever Some "undesirable life forms" (like poison ivy) will become more "undesirable" as they will thrive in warmer climates The ice in both poles may melt in large quantity. Glaciers are melting as we speak . Species living on ice and procreating on ice as the Polar Bear, penguins and seals will become extinct Increase of sea levels will cover some islands and low lands Increase in diseases from pollution Some of the world's food supplies may become severely affected Some opposing groups postulate that those dangers are exaggerated but provide no scientific data that allows to disregard the risks.
Therefore international organizations and governments have established, preventively, extraordinary meetings on climate change and similar issues as well as protocols as i.e. The Kyoto Protocol for reduction of gas emissions Another view All of the above consequences of global warming are considered hypothetical by some groups who postulate that there is no scientific evidence Global warming skeptics claim that they can, in fact, provide scientific evidence that proves not only that the risks are exaggerated, but that it is, in fact, likely that mankind will benefit from global warming. On the other hand, even the IPCC admits that they cannot say with any certainty that the net effect of global warming will be bad for humanity Note This is a controversial issue.
The reader is hereby alerted that in issues where opposing views are presented, it is recommended to review all the available information from both points of view as well as neutral information if such is available, for having the chance to freely evaluate the issue by oneself.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.