What did you think about the winning goal of the Stanley Cup Series?

No. Did I see th red light go on?No. Did I see on replay that it was a fantastic Stanley Cup winning shot?

Absolutely. I have looked through all of the media, and have yet to find a reference to the goal that won the Cup as "anti-climactic". I would sure like to see a couple of your "many" references, just out of curiosity, since it seems to make no sense at all to refer to it as anticlimactic.

It was the final and highest climax of the entire series, was it not? I mean, didn't they all stop playing and award the cup to Chicago based on that goal? I've checked the NY Times, ESPN, NHL.

COM, CNN, Yahoo, MSNBC, and FOX, and I found no mention of the goal being referred to as "anticlimactic". In fact, I found this quote that seems to inidicate exactly t "Kane will go down as scoring one of the biggest goals in team history." http://msn.foxsports.com/nhl/story/blackhawks-snap-48-year-stanley-cup-drought-060910 That sounds like almost exactly the opposite of "many referring to it as anticlimactic" What gives?

If this was an anticlimactic moment, some other moment must have been climactic. Please share with us your sources and what they said WAS the climactic moment, if not the winning goal? I am truly baffled.

Maybe if I read or heard a few of your sources I will understand what they are trying to say. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdVn42-vOt8.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.