What do you think of the 3D technology used in Clash of the Titans?

I can fully understand why the movie business has embraced 3D. As television sets become bigger and bigger, providing a cinema-like experience at home, cinema's need to think of something else to keep their cutting edge, making people come and see the movies in theaters, instead of waiting for them to arrive home. 3D appears to be that new cutting edge.It really adds something to the movie when done correctly, especially on certain movies, like Avatar and Alcie in Wonderland.

However, as often, when the movie industry finds out something works for one movie, they believe it will work for all, and slap it on everything they produce. This also happens now, with each and every movie getting the 3D treatment, hoping the two additional letters '3D' to the movie title will bring in the crowds.In the case of Clash of the Titans, I feel this utterly failed. The movie itself is just not that good, and adding 3D to it has failed to save it.

Apparently, the audience is not as stupid as many movie makers want them to be, and they can clearly see which movie is good, and which one only pretends to be good.So, 'Clash' has to move over now, it's had its chance. Newer, better movies await, and hopefully they will only get '3D' when it really adds to the story, or the movie experience, or '3D' will go simply down in history as one of those tried out techniques that never really got mainstream.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.