What if Assad is right? What if Syria didn't use chemical weapons? Should the U.S. still attack?

No one can tell which side has been using chemical weapons. Russia got Assad to dispose of his chemical weapons in 2013 but maybe that is not all of them. What I wonder is, how the rebels or terrorists who are fighting him got a hold of them.

The U.S. didn't have to frame Assad. He did have chemical weapons at one time. The U.S. is using the IS presence as an excuse to attack Assad.

No country can legally attack another except in self-defense. Thats why Iraq was illegal. The first time in 1991 the U.S. claimed Kuwait needed help but that was not a full scale invasion.

Russia is a liar, Assad has stocks of chemical weapons. A month ago he used chlorine gas on idlib civilians at night, everyone suffocating and dying..... And the barrel bombs that he drops indiscriminately in civilian areas. It's appalling that when Kurds got faded the world reacted in split second when Assad did it no reaction.

USA did not do anything about because Russia is desperately clinging to what is left of its influence in Mid East so USA backed away from accusing assad.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.