What is the actual evidence the Christian god is real, that Christians keep claiming to have but never present?

ROME! The best actual evidence." Oh, the organization that finally put you morons on the map?

How is that evidence?

Obviously there isn't physical evidence. People are convinced of their religious truths mostly through experiences that purely personal, and which cannot be demonstrated. They are nevertheless real enough to have convinced most people on earth of SOME religious truths.

They run into trouble when they pretend to have anything resembling a scientific case for any of their supernatural claims, whether it's resurrections, miracles, parting waters, or the existence of their deity. That's not just true for Christians but all deist religions. It's human nature to try to invent scientific backup for what are beliefs, I suppose.

Fact #1: After his crucifixion, Jesus was buried by Joseph of Arimathea in the tomb. This fact is highly significant because it means that the location of Jesus’s tomb was known to Jew and Christian alike. In that case it becomes inexplicable how belief in his resurrection could arise and flourish in the face of a tomb containing his corpse.

According to the late John A. T. Robinson of Cambridge University, the honorable burial of Jesus is one of "the earliest and best-attested facts about Jesus."{15} Fact #2: On the Sunday morning following the crucifixion, the tomb of Jesus was found empty by a group of his women followers.

According to Jakob Kremer, an Austrian specialist on the resurrection, "By far most exegeses hold firmly to the reliability of the biblical statements concerning the empty tomb."{16} As D. H. Van Daalen points out, "It is extremely difficult to object to the empty tomb on historical grounds; those who deny it do so on the basis of theological or philosophical assumptions."{17} Fact #3: On multiple occasions and under various circumstances, different individuals and groups of people experienced appearances of Jesus alive from the dead.

This is a fact that is almost universally acknowledged among New Testament scholars today. Even Gert Lüdemann, perhaps the most prominent current critic of the resurrection, admits, "It may be taken as historically certain that Peter and the disciples had experiences after Jesus’s death in which Jesus appeared to them as the risen Christ."{18} Finally, fact #4: The original disciples believed that Jesus was risen from the dead despite their having every reason not to. Despite having every predisposition to the contrary, it is an undeniable fact of history that the original disciples believed in, proclaimed, and were willing to go to their deaths for the fact of Jesus’s resurrection.

C. F. D.

Moule of Cambridge University concludes that we have here a belief which nothing in terms of prior historical influences can account for--apart from the resurrection itself. {19} Jesus’s Miracles. Even the most skeptical critics cannot deny that the historical Jesus carried out a ministry of miracle-working and exorcism.

Rudolf Bultmann, one of the most skeptical scholars this century has seen, wrote back in 1926: Most of the miracle stories contained in the gospels are legendary or at least are dressed up with legends. But there can be no doubt that Jesus did such deeds, which were, in his and his contemporaries’ understanding, miracles, that is, deeds that were the result of supernatural, divine causality. Doubtless he healed the sick and cast out demons.

{9} According to Luke Johnson, a New Testament scholar at Emory University Even the most critical historian can confidently assert that a Jew named Jesus worked as a teacher and wonder-worker in Palestine during the reign of Tiberius, was executed by crucifixion under the prefect Pontius Pilate and continued to have followers after his death. {1}.

A lot of people cite miracles as proof of God's existence. Stuff like the Shroud of Turin, Jesus Toast, and Kirk Cameron are just some of the miracles.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.