Something that is truly anonymous has no known name or identity or known source. For research data to be considered anonymous, no identifiers of any kind (e.g. , name, code number, etc.) are used that can link the data or information to the individual who provided it. In contrast, research data that do have identifiers present that link individual participants with their data or information need to have appropriate provisions made to protect confidentiality.
In this situation the researcher has been entrusted with private information and the confidence of the participants and the researcher is responsible for addressing how sensitive information will be protected.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.