What will Barack Obama have to accomplish before he seals your vote in the 2012 Elections?

My father had an interesting outlook on voting. What he told me when I was 18 was "@buddawiggi you most likely will never have enough money or power (most folks don't and will not he said) for the Presidential election to make a huge difference in you life. ", "vote local, there's where you will have an impact."

So he told me look at things like this; 1) At the beginning of each Presidential election cycle take a honest, accurate, and objective inventory of your life and the state of the world, remember what you see, you will need this info. 2) When trying to decide who to vote for in the next election just remember how your life and the state of the world was 4 or 8 years ago and if it is the same or better, vote for the incumbent or their party in the case of term limits. If you are worse off then vote for the other guy.So for President Obama to secure my vote at the end of his term(s) he will have had to, in my opinion, noticeably improved the state of the world as it relates to my quality of life and improve, in my opinion, the state of the world overall as it relates to everybody's quality of life.

I do not know if this way of determining who to vote for is similar to yours or anyone elses but it is mine and it has been working for me so far.

Reduce the size of government and involvement in our lives. Be fair to all citizens, not just some. Protect the interests of America first.

He has to get the troops out of Iraq and spend the tax money within the country to make it economically stronger.

Completly change his politics, advisors and become a republican.

That would depend on who's running against him. If the Republican party is some kind of crazy level dumb and puts Sarah Palin as their presidential candidate, Obama has my vote if he does nothing for the next 3 years. If they load up Gary Johnson as the next candidate, then what Obama has done with the tax policy might not be enough to counter what Gary will promise on the campaign trail, but what Obama has done elsewhere would matter - so in this case he'd want to have gotten the troops out of Iraq and be making progress in Afghanistan.

If they put in Mitt Romney, then Obama's progress in the wars wouldn't be an effective defense, because Romney would be very proactive on the military front. Also the charm of Obama would face fierce competition from Mitt Romney. So Obama would have to have shown a good shutdown of the bailouts to all the unworthy companies and CEOs, a platform which Mitt Romney probably couldn't stand behind, being a former CEO.

Mike Huckabee would bring in some strength on the religious voter front, being an ordained minister. But also in that case, there's little that Obama would need to do to get me to vote for him, as I feel religion can cloud issues a president needs to be dealing with. So in a hypothetical world where a super-candidate could come in and trump Obama in debate, charm, appeal and policy, and all we had to look at were Obama's actions to decide, then I'd want significant progress in Iraq, moderate progress in Afghanistan, moderate progress towards renewable resources, making good on his promise about homosexuals in the military, and success in one or two things he hasn't yet promised, because something's bound to happen in office that noone predicted.

National Healthcare, Troop Withdrawal,and show positive effects of his ideology on education and the job market.....

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.