What would the liberal reaction be if Bush ordered a US citizen civilian killed with a drone strike?

Under current US Constitutional Law any citizen of the United States who willfully cross the lines of Sedition is warrant perils of their fate. Sedition is a term of law which refers to overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority as tending toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority.

Sedition may include any commotion, though not aimed at direct and open violence against the laws. Seditious words in writing are seditious libel. A seditionist is one who engages in or promotes the interests of sedition.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedition and Treason The Treason Act 1795 (sometimes also known as the Treasonable Practices Act1) was one of two acts introduced by the British government in the wake of the stoning of King George III on his way to open Parliament in 1795, the other being the Seditious Meetings Act 1795. The Act made it high treason to "within the realm or without compass, imagine, invent, devise or intend death or destruction, or any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maim or wounding, imprisonment or restraint, of the person of ... the King." This was derived from the Sedition Act 1661, which had expired.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason_Act...

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.