When is it "cultural appropriation" and when is it not?

Because as usual non-white racists have so little to point to, they must invent "offenses" as it is, they try and pass off the headress as some kind of magical, holy religious relic when its NOTHING of the sort. When you went out and did a bang up job raping, murdering and pillaging...to the point of impressing your fellow violent barbarians... it was then they bestowed on you a feather in recognition for your deeds... yes...its the EXACT equivelent of wearing a necklaces made of human earlobes...it was supposed to intimitade and garner 'respect' in that regard.... yeah, its that tiny little detail thats forgotten as morons try to pass this off as being "spirituality". Anyone non-white who has the gall to complain about anyone "mocking" their cutlural norms.... I would hope they are at least wearing that headress or appropriate skins their cutlure entailed INSTEAD of that cute pantsuit and shoes or other aspect of white western culture while they do so.

Otherwise that would be complete racist hypocrisy on their part... wouldnt it?

1) That way of life is NOT long gone. 2) a headdress is a significant spiritual sign. Elders work VERY hard their whole lives to earn the status to wear one, so to wear a mass produced one is cultural appropriation, disrespectful, and just plain ignorant.

Also, just because someone is an Indian from a tribe where the headdress is used doesn't even give them the right to wear one. They must earn it.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.