There is an old geek joke... which is not totally wrong: - use Mac if you want to lose money - use Linux if you want to lose time - use Windows if you want to lose time and money My personal perception is that 80% of Mac users are in fact adepts and are somehow integrists, so it might be at time difficult to interpret the truth in their enthusiasm. Mac OS is very good, but as every OS has it part of problems... and they are not significantly less than the others. Its small market share (90%.
This is NOT a proof of a better quality, but the proof of a better price/performance for the combination hardware+software. You can run windows on any sort of hardware, whether high or low-cost. Vista has been a failure, because it is draining too much of computer hardware resources.
Windows 7 will try to address that... but although lots of people are enthusiastic about it we will have to wait for the real thing. That Vista is so resources-greedy has had an interesting consequence: the price of hardware has dropped intensely for the last 2 years (independently of the netbook effect I describe later) Drawbacks and advantages: inverse those I described for the Mac. Linux is not yet fully ready for every user station, EXCEPT in some very precise avatars: the netbooks have been initially launched with their own version of Linux, and the combination hardware + software has really created a break.
The success has been so great that Microsoft has had to proactively try to defend Windows against it, and somehow succeeded since most netbooks are offered now with a windows XP version. (Next step for Microsoft is to persuade netbooks manufacturers to deliver more powerful hardware, even at a price increase cost, so that they can run Windows7 and forget Linux). For viruses, Linux is still not a good target so there are not that many.(For those integrists which believe there can be no virus on linux.... remember that the first worldwide virus/worm disseminated worldwide thanks to Unix).
For software, there is now a correct library of applications, although not as high as Mac. BUT THIS IS CHANGING FAST since the open-source movement is developing and creating Linux/ Mac /windows versions of each application. Coming back to you initial question: which is best?
None is best in every situation... - If my neighbour wants a computer for personal use, I would probably suggest Windows: good software, good library, fair enough OS, cheap hardware. - Same for this other neighbour which will run her small business - For this young friend which paints and draws and wants to communicate her work over the Internet, I would probably suggest a Mac. - Same for this old friend which at 80 wants to write his memories and intends doing research over the Internet.
- For my niece who needs a computer for her high-school studies in a literary area... I would suggest a netbook (10") with whichever Linux it will be running.
There is an old geek joke... which is not totally wrong: - use Mac if you want to lose money - use Linux if you want to lose time - use Windows if you want to lose time and money My personal perception is that 80% of Mac users are in fact adepts and are somehow integrists, so it might be at time difficult to interpret the truth in their enthusiasm. Mac OS is very good, but as every OS has it part of problems... and they are not significantly less than the others. Its small market share (90%.
This is NOT a proof of a better quality, but the proof of a better price/performance for the combination hardware+software. You can run windows on any sort of hardware, whether high or low-cost. Vista has been a failure, because it is draining too much of computer hardware resources.
Windows 7 will try to address that... but although lots of people are enthusiastic about it we will have to wait for the real thing. That Vista is so resources-greedy has had an interesting consequence: the price of hardware has dropped intensely for the last 2 years (independently of the netbook effect I describe later) Drawbacks and advantages: inverse those I described for the Mac. Linux is not yet fully ready for every user station, EXCEPT in some very precise avatars: the netbooks have been initially launched with their own version of Linux, and the combination hardware + software has really created a break.
The success has been so great that Microsoft has had to proactively try to defend Windows against it, and somehow succeeded since most netbooks are offered now with a windows XP version. (Next step for Microsoft is to persuade netbooks manufacturers to deliver more powerful hardware, even at a price increase cost, so that they can run Windows7 and forget Linux). For viruses, Linux is still not a good target so there are not that many.(For those integrists which believe there can be no virus on linux.... remember that the first worldwide virus/worm disseminated worldwide thanks to Unix).
For software, there is now a correct library of applications, although not as high as Mac. BUT THIS IS CHANGING FAST since the open-source movement is developing and creating Linux/ Mac /windows versions of each application. Coming back to you initial question: which is best?
None is best in every situation... - If my neighbour wants a computer for personal use, I would probably suggest Windows: good software, good library, fair enough OS, cheap hardware. - Same for this other neighbour which will run her small business - For this young friend which paints and draws and wants to communicate her work over the Internet, I would probably suggest a Mac. - Same for this old friend which at 80 wants to write his memories and intends doing research over the Internet.
- For my niece who needs a computer for her high-school studies in a literary area... I would suggest a netbook (10") with whichever Linux it will be running ...
This is the best comparison I have seen. It is old now, and all of the operating systems have improved significantly since then, but it will give you a good idea of their strengths and weaknesses, and to me the most important part is the end where it says which OS is best for several specific types of users. pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2273486,00.asp It is from PC Magazine.
I agree with the overall conclusion that OS X is the best overall OS for most users.
For one, home users can get Linux for a very cheap price, and most of the time for free. Plus, the operating system can be installed on more than one computer without any additional cost. Microsoft only allows a single copy of the program to be used on only one computer.
Upgrades are another story. If you need to buy Windows upgrades, be prepared to shell out more than a hundred bucks. Whereas regular updates and ongoing support for the desktop version of Linux only cost a quarter of what Windows is charging its users.
When you buy a Windows OS, most of the software programs bundled with it is not that useful to the customer. Some even call these "crapwares". The Linux you buy on CDs come with a number of free application software.
Since Linux software is offered for free and open source, any knowledgeable user can change the source code and customize the features based on your preference and use. For those who understand programming, when doing any specific tasks, Linux offers quite a number of choices. Try searching for a text editor on Freshmeat and you'll be surprised to see the more than hundreds of options in your search result.
Usability of software that resides on a Linux system is relatively better than that software on Windows. This is because Linux is an open source, and there are a number of options just for text editing on the command line. If you are a loyal Linux user, you would know that programmers and advanced users can even share their own applications regularly.
The Linux application can be a tweaked version of an existing application meant to improve its features. At the same time, it can also be a totally new application. This brings me to another plus for Linux.
For those who know programming, you have the power to control almost anything on the Linux operating system. First, you can customize the look and feel of the desktop of the GUI (graphical user interface) in a variety of ways. Of course, you can change the desktop theme and change your wallpaper in Windows, but the modification is very limited compared with what you can do in a Linux environment.
Another advantage that Linux offers its users is its security feature. If you have been using Windows for a long time now, you'll know that you need to buy separately the virus protection software like McAfee or Norton. At the same time, so many malicious software run on Windows.
On the other hand, since their first release in the early nineties, there hasn't been any reported serious case of virus, spyware and adware infections in Linux. If you dissect the programs closely experts say that Linux have somewhat adopted the security features and capabilities of UNIX where the notion of an administrative (root) user that maintains and operates the system, and desktop users who only run the software on the system. And while in this arena, there might be many improvements that Windows have done, overall, Linux security is far better than that of Windows.
Lastly, laptops and desktops sold in the market with pre-installed Linux OS are relatively cheaper than those with Windows OS. Try and pay a visit in any Wal-mart or Best Buy shop and see for yourself. Also, Linux can be installed on those old 386 or XT computers in your basement.
You might argue that these computers, even with Linux running will not be of great use, but I can tell you that once Linux is up and running, your old computers can be used as a back-up server or a firewall. Now this for sure, you cannot do if you install Windows on this machine. There are still a number of benefits that Linux has to offer like multiple users, hard disk partitions, clustering and so on.
The best advice I can give is for you to try Linux yourself and see the benefits of this OS.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.