The Lakers was the best team is the NBA Finals for 2010 because they were the champions. The Boston Celtics put up a good fight but the Lakers are the hungrier team. They were there to avenge a painful finals loss to Boston 2 years ago where they were actually humiliated by fans who threw stones on their bus while leaving the basketball arena.
I am a Boston fan but I guess age is catching up with the team. Paul Pierce, Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen are Boston's Big Three but they have been playing for so many years and we can actually say its past their prime. Kobe Bryant is the best player for a couple of years now and he does not want to leave a legacy where he will not be put in line with Lakers greats such as Magic Johnson, Kareem Abdul Jabar and Wilt URL1 make the Celtics competitive again, they have to recruit more young players who can complement Rajon Rondo's play, speed and competitiveness.
“The best team ever. On one hand, Chamberlain is biased – he just happens to have been the center of that team. On the other hand, he did see them up close and personal, so he should know.
But even more objective observers would not have a hard time defending Chamberlain’s statement. In fact, in 1981, a panel of experts chose the Sixers as the best team in the first 35 years of the league. That was obviously before the great Celtics and Lakers teams of the 1980s and the Bulls of the ‘90s.
But it’s nonetheless a noteworthy selection in light of the way the Boston and Minneapolis/Los Angeles franchises had dominated the league’s formative years, combining to win 21 of the league’s first 35 team titles. The 1966-67 Sixers compiled a 68-13 regular-season record, which ranked as the best in NBA history until the Los Angeles Lakers went 69-13 in 1971-72. Well, no, but examined within the context of its time, Philadelphia’s achievement was quite remarkable, perhaps as remarkable as Chicago’s.
“There were 10 teams in the league then,” Chamberlain was quick to point out. “We were going up against Boston, the defending champion, nine times a year. Like so much of what Chamberlain said during his life, that may well be an exaggeration made for effect.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.