Why are they called "rebels" when terrorists attacks some country, and "terrorists" when they attack US?

The Obama administration wasn't lying. It just didn't want to jump to conclusions without getting the facts straight. Conservatives are too quick to jump to conclusions and accuse the administration of lying when it isn't.

It's a bad habit they have from buying into their own political spin too much. It's this kind of disconnect from reality that equates criticizing a movie with apologizing for American freedoms. (When I think about all the criticism conservatives level at Hollywood, they must be the biggest apologists for America's commitment to free speech ever.).

Some of the media outlets are not so in the tank for him now and were not afraid to ask questions and get real answers. That Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and Obama played the "it's the amateur video, stupid" scenario for the tragedy in Libya and Ms. Clinton had the classless temerity to opine on that video at the ceremony bringing the murdered diplomats back to Andrews on Friday.

Obama does not like to place the words Muslim and Terrorist in the same frame as it makes his earlier comments when elected, look foolish. The Obama Administration doesn't deal in truth, just reelection jargon. Now, his much touted foreign policy actually looks nonexistent.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.