I won't be voting for him. You listed all of the reasons in your details.
Its very simple. She was meant to humanize Mittens, and bring over independents to there side. All she did though was cheerleading for the base, those who had no doubt that they were voting for Romney already, just as the rest of the speakers did nothing to appeal to independents.
Basically she couldn't help but show that both of them are 1%ers who can't relate to the rest of america. just like most of the people behind the republican party. Though they know they cant get enough votes that way, so they use religion, racism and hate to appeal to those who are not very educated and are easily lead by such divisive topics, instead of trying to bring people together to make a better country and cultivate understanding and cooperation to change things for the better, so everybody has what they need to have a decent life. Instead of Romneys and this incarnation of the Republican parties idea that our system should be based on social darwinism like in the late 1800's guilded age.
It has to be the most reactionary platform in over a century. Its sickening and extreme enough to cause social unrest if its put into effect.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.