Why didn't President Obama mention that the Paris killings were don in the name of of islam, by muslims, shouting allahu akbar?

The same BS! Moderates! Pah!

US started undermining Syria in 2006. Not till 2011 did they manage to ignite a civil war! Syria is seen as a prize by every country who armed the jihadi "Rebels".

Aggression? Seriously? Its NOT 2003!

Then it was "45 minutes BS"! Iran, Russia and Syria own their own banks, have their own foreign policy! Hence all suffer US' wrath!

EU does as US dictates! The whole integrated financial system kept afloat via bailouts, and bailins! Greece à NATO member got a rough ride, whilst Ukraine NOT a NATO member got the gravy ride, thanks to geopolitical games!

US' adventures in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya an unmitigated disaster! What has US to lose? Its financial system since 2008 on endless $ printing, known as quantitative easing!

So much for recovery! US wars drag on and on and on, and on! Costing trillions!

But not to worry, $ is the sole reserve currency! Er, no, China, Russia are fed up for subsidizing US' endless belligerence! US encircled NATO round Russia!

Then Ukraine! US backed pro democracy movements in Hong Kong against China! Plus US nudged Japan into changing its peaceful constitution!

Japan and China don't see eye to eye over some Islands! Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya all disasters leading to civilians fleeting for Europe enmass! US didn't unleash "democracy" liberation or whatever excuse of the day US uses!

Europeans dead upset! Blame US for "humanitarian interventions". Ah, another war!

Great distraction! How can religious nutjobs go wrong! When they are jihadies, be surprising if anything went right!

Fun & games will ensue when no communication and cooperation result in belligerent NATO citing the same excuse as WW1 & WW2 "you hit my ally, So nuclear war" Aim &,....... Trillion $ upgrade http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/10/09/nuclear-madness-natos-wmd-sharing-must-end/ "Sending a signal to Russia that NATO is modernising its European infrastructure and deploying new high-tech bombs is bound to elicit a reaction. Even as we write, reports are coming in that Russia will respond by withdrawing from the INF-Treaty, basing SS-26/Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad (didn’t they already do that?) and targeting Germany with nuclear weapons. And what will be the NATO response to all of those threats?

When will this escalation become hysteria and the first ‘shot across the bows’ start a nuclear war? Nuclear deterrence is the archetypal security dilemma. You have to keep threatening to use nuclear weapons to make it work.

And the more you threaten, the more likely it is that they will be used.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.