They are interesting questions. 1. While I would initiate friendship with a man on a completely platonic basis (I am married/partnered for 18 years) I do think that its because when all common ground and intellectual compatibility is put aside, I enjoy the juxtaposed nature of male/female friendship.
The almost flirtatious aspect of it. I think it would be difficult to have a good friendship with a (heterosexual) man that didn't have some degree of sexual (not really the word I am looking for) curiousness/tension. I think it is just human nature for that to be.
I don't believe that it should be acknowledged or investigated though. 2. I think every relationship/friendship has a see-saw nature to it.
Relationships are very rarely, truly equal emotionally, and there is usually one who will depend on the other at various times. If you mean that one party (female) is holding out for a romantic relationship, in a platonic friendship, it would be hard to maintain the friendship. 3.
I don't know if women do compensate for love. Maybe some women confuse physical affection for love sometimes. I think women need to feel gratified a lot of the time, and will fill this void with whatever works at the time (clothes, pets, female friendship, sex) 4.
I imagine a man would be more compassionate about a stalker, simply because I think that men are less likely to feel physically threatened by a woman. But its hard to talk as a woman who has no experience with stalking or being stalked. Forgive if I didn't get the gist of the questions.
I m pretty sure these r the most interesting differences between men and women: http://www.leisuremartini.com/gender-wars-funny-differences-men-women.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.