Why do most countries with universal health care have lower tax rates than the United States?

The spin doctor's want to turn this into something it's not; they did the same thing when Clinton proposed it... and not to mention we didn't even get universal health care which was the mandate going in... so I don't know what all the fuss is about... we layered on some additional regulation and co-ops but it is still all going to be run by the private sector.

It's not in the rules, it's in the enforcement. Employees are according to the rule required to enroll in national health care in Japan. But if some employee does not enroll, there is no penalty - hence lax enforcement.

Nevertheless, without the insurance and without enough cash to cover some arising health care need, the uncovered employee will be most free to die. As you can see, it's a very free system and very non-fascist. The antithesis to freedom is fascism.

So, it's not whether you have some program in place, it's whether you do or do not have fascism in place that determines your levels of freedom. No fascism = full freedom. So it's not a balance between health care and freedom in any sense.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.