I believe this to be among your very best questions, because with just a modest attempt to look at who would be at greatest risk, Liberals should be horrified and probably justifiably scared. Of course, they struggle to think that far ahead, and many here recognize they often seem to struggle to think at all. Their likely first target would be known gays.
Anyone out of the closet who feels like all their protective laws and favor wrangled under our too often radically liberal justice system would be a target. The likely result, if the rest of the Muslim world can be the template for what to expect, would be hangings, beheadings, mistreatment and physical harm the likes of which no homosexual or mainstream traditional straight individual has ever seen in our land. Next on the list would probably be women.
Breaking any number of a wide range of rules could result in harsh discipline that in other parts of the world include stoning, beatings and a shocking range of physical harm. Simply resisting or disagreeing with a husband, father or any number of males considered to be in higher positions of authority than any female could result in the disfigurement many have seen through recent images, which included an unfortunate woman who had her nose cut off as well as other facial damage at the hands of a Muslim husband dissatisfied with her disobedience. If any hint of Christian traditions were allowed to continue, such as wedding vows, the typical promise to "love, honor, and obey" (some churches elect to use serve in place of honor) would take on a significantly more weighty meaning that should scare any female.
The vow and subsequent role of servitude would seem dark and threatening, returning women to a status they could only have been subjected to centuries earlier, and perhaps never on this continent. Next, law breakers at almost every level would recognize the more stringent and harsh application of consequences that would seem to evade reason by any of our current standards. There would be plenty of people roaming our streets without hands and arms and with all kinds of missing appendages as if we rolled all of the wounded survivors from all the wars the United States engaged in during the 20th century back into a new America, over how Sharia Law dictates handling offenses from petty theft to more substantial activities not acceptable under the Quran.
With regard to our largest group of lawbreakers in the country, they undoubtedly would be held accountable in costly ways as is regularly the result under Sharia. Perhaps the Mexican illegals would be rounded up and promptly placed in internment camps on their way to deportation. Those known to have committed offenses beyond simply illegally crossing the border could be expected to be dealt with harshly for the drugs and violence they inflicted on others around them, certain to be stoned, burned or beaten to death.
And if deportation seemed too unwieldy and unworkable as a solution, the incredibly unforgiving Sharia policies might progress to the more readily administered gassing or modern alternative for genocide of offenders who everyone knows don't have any legal basis or rights to be here. The incredible consequence of Sharia Law being instituted in the United States would lead to systematic, almost unimaginably harsh treatment of many of the core groups making up the Liberal Democratic Party. Not only would harsh physical harm become a certainty, your question asked about who would be killed first, second, and then third.
Each of the ordered cleansings in the way of violent life-taking activities could be expected to apply to the groups mentioned above as first, second, and third, but if you wanted to count the numbers more in the way of individuals eliminated at the hands of Sharia, I'm sure you could make it into the hundreds of thousands or millions with almost shockingly limited numbers of conservatives being the recipients of the forced purge of lawbreaking, infidel offenders. I'm not sure why liberals are their biggest fans, because many of the rest of us believe addressing aberrant behavior of some of the groups above could serve the country well. Especially cleaning up the continuing damage, stifling economic costs, and outright criminal activities of the 20-plus million illegals.
Simply snubbing their noses at our laws and any hint that there might be legal consequences for them would come to a crashing halt. Is any of this starting to sound better to you? Do you suppose we could contract with the right Muslim sect for two years of Sharia to clean up the country before sending them home?
Anyone who's followed their harsh application of judgment and consequences for unacceptable activities should readily recognize who will be held accountable and who will be killed first, second, third, all the way to 10 millionth and beyond. Isn't it great liberals sound so ready to kill one another and potentially even themselves? Wow.
They're quite the bunch! Thanks again for the great question. The extent of liberals’ foolishness is hard to comprehend, at times, and the very real consequences of supporting a group who conservatives are outspoken in opposition against would at some level be amusing to witness.
Sorry, libs, it’s just hard for some of us to see it any other way.
I just watched a young girl get stoned to death, for refusing to marry an old man that her parents arranged.it is so graphic and horrifying, that I could not sleep last night. If you want me to email it to you I can. If I put it on here, you know that YA would never allow it.
That's sharia law. Americans have heard about it, but not seen. Open your eyes, to the horror.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.