When someone can enlighten me to explaining the distorted platform f/ the right wing I can not be any more ready to listen. They are SO about contradiction. The party claims against tax increases yet bush sr.
Challenged us to read his lips. The party claims to be for less gov spending yet bush jr. signed every spending bill to cross his desk en route to America setting a new record debt everyday when he left office. Apparently, when a rep is in power exceptions are acceptable.
They think more guns is a solution. Heck, abortion clinics were bombed ... that's right wing extremism. This evolving rep party has reduced it self to focusing on the wealthy campaign contribution constituency at the expense of the rest of us.
No wonder it lost the black, hispanic, asian, female and youth vote in the last election. The party has been reduced to aging white men while it moves farther f/ the middle. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/20...
A false dilemma (also called false dichotomy, the either-or fallacy, fallacy of false choice, black-and/or-white thinking, or the fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses) is a type of informal fallacy that involves a situation in which only two alternatives are considered, when in fact there is at least one additional option. The options may be a position that is between the two extremes (such as when there are shades of grey) or may be a completely different alternative. Also: Appeal to emotion or argumentum ad passiones is a logical fallacy which uses the manipulation of the recipient's emotions, rather than valid logic, to win an argument.
The appeal to emotion fallacy uses emotions as the basis of an argument's position without factual evidence that logically supports the major ideas endorsed by the elicitor of the argument. Also, this kind of thinking may be evident in one who lets emotions and/or other subjective considerations influence one's reasoning process. This kind of appeal to emotion is a type of red herring and encompasses several logical fallacies... And finally: A straw man or straw person, also known in the UK as an Aunt Sally, is a type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.
To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by replacing it with a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"), and to refute it, without ever having actually refuted the original position. Amazing how one liberal can utilize three different fallacies of thought and reasoning in a single sentence.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.