What I have seen On Yahoo Answers, is a not-thought -through expectation of wireless speakers when applied to home audio equipment. A "wireless" system really does not replace speaker wire. Speaker wire carries both the sound signal, and the electromotive force to drive the large motor that a speaker actually is.
Power transferred to it from a central amplifier. Wireless systems only "transmit" the signal, not the needed power. This means that each speaker must be equipped with its own amplifier, which being electrically run, needs to be plugged into the wall.
Used to very small, easily powered by hearing aid battery devices, like Bluetooth ear plugs for phones, some consumers accept that this would be simply carried over to large systems, and there are such systems, but not necessarily the best answer to home sound systems. For one thing, your speakers must now be placed, each one, near a wall outlet and plugged in, which is restrictive, and most surround systems have six to eight speakers to plug in. - that a lot of tied up electrical outlets.
So there is no savings here from not running a simple speaker wire. The power amplifiers that must be built in to each speaker need feeding wall current unless they are well, tiny, and can run on batteries that you are willing to replace on a daily basis, or hourly if the speakers are large. A.
Built in amplifiers give off more heat into the speaker, which can build up and change its sound. External heat sinks and fins only carry away a portion of this heat. Much still builds up in the cabinet.
B: Central receivers are able to use circuits that might be shared between the needs of the individual amplifiers they include, This saves cost, money that can be put to better quality amplification, such as the power transformers used. All these savings go away when each speaker and amplifier is an island unto itself. So, the speakers must be considerably more expensive cumulatively than the cost of central amp, or suffer from inferior quality.
C. Some speakers for surround will have to be placed, in most homes, at a distance from the transmitter. (which, of course is not free either, and an additional system expense, as are all the radio-wave receivers that must be employed) The receivers can pick up stray signals, or become disrupted.
Finally, the consumer still needs to supply a pre amplifier, or central controller anyway, to select between sources and perhaps provide for radio reception, so the solution does not decrease the number of "boxes" or necessarily the cost, required for a true system. Usually, beyond the size of desktop mixing monitors, (which are very expensive for their small size, in the range of three hundred dollars each speaker) , ten bucks worth of lamp chord (Maybe a bit more if you want to be cunning and route it so as to hide it utterly) is the more practical and cost effective answer, to date.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.