Why is the media, incl. Fox News, not reporting on the Geert Wilders 'Trial of the Century' or the Orly Taitz 'Quo-Warranto' filing in DC?

Fox news channel is more likely to address these issues you bring forward, although they are probably trying to stay clear of foreign cases involving Islam. Those who cry loudest about Obama's right, ability, authority, and eligibility to be President are beginning to sound just a little bit crazy and people are starting to shut their ears to the squeaky wheel. Do you think it may be possible that Fox is being discretionary in their reporting of this kind of thing because it's like beating a dead horse?

Once Obama is out of office and proof of his birth comes out (he's hiding it while in office, spending millions of taxpayer dollars to do so) then he can be put in prison along with Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid who signed his eligibility papers. As for other media outlets, you probably know as well as I do that they are not going to say anything much to set a bad light on this President. It is unfortunate that there is no real proof.It's left/right on everything, instead of America, the United States, or We, the People.

Until the entire media can get out of the pocket of the President, we'll lose some of the important info that is out there for us to hear. Do you have links on your question? I'd like to read about it.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.