No. Obama gets more cash because he's the incumbent. Just one of many advantages of incumbency.
Also because the GOP are seen today as miserable failures. And they have nobody to blame but themselves. We have needed serious campaign finance reform in the US for decades now.
For the great majority of that time it was Democrats who wanted reform and Republicans who insisted it wasn't necessary. I guess it isn't surprising that it's always the party with less money that wants finance reform. But in a way you can hardly blame Obama for taking advantage of circumstances he had no part in creating.
Incumbents vs. a ragged field of possibilities. The real cash won't come out this early in any primary. It's like you've never seen an election before.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.