Will republicans agree with Paul on the killing of al-Awlaki?

Because he fears that if an American Citizen can be killed that easily, even if he fell under the Enemy Combatant status, any of us can be killed just as easily, I agree. I'm glad that terrorist scum is dead, but it's scary to learn that there is a 'secret list' (look it up) with 20 names of Americans on it and Al-whateverthehell was one of those names.

If anyone says 'It was really wrong for Obama to do that,' Michael Savage will agree before he hears what it is. The whole idea of being a Republican today is that Obama is wrong no matter what he does. Even if it was something Republicans wanted, it's still wrong.

This is the same way they treated Clinton, BTW. Clinton even famously reversed himself 180 degrees on a few issues, and the Republicans still howled in outrage that he was just as wrong as he could be.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions