My response: The following is a breakdown of most liberal to least liberal justices on the Supreme Court: Ginsberg: very liberal, consistently votes against the conservatives Sotomayor: consistently votes with the progressive bloc Kagan: has consistently voted with the liberal bloc since joining the bench, but still fairly unproven Breyer: usually votes with the liberal bloc, but has proven centrist in the past Kennedy: the swing vote; considered a conservative; sometimes votes with the liberal faction Alito: consistently conservative Roberts: consistently conservative Scalia: extremely conservative Thomas: extremely conservative So for all you Paul folks who would allow 0bama to win simply because you might not win. Here's some food for thought. I wrote in Pauls' name in 08 and stuck to my principles... But nope, not this time around.
I'll vote for Paul again during the primary, but will take my chances on a RINO if it comes down to that for one reason and one reason only: Our court system and hanging on to the few threads left in our Constitution.
Obama has been a pathetic failure though. Isn't it more important to get the right person elected than to settle a score? You sound like an Obama supporter who is trying to get votes from Ron Paul's fan base.
Nice try.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.