Would the Republicans have won the Senate too, if a few candidates could have just kept their mouths shut?

More disappointed. Their status quo attitude makes the Republican Party part of the corruption and there is no hope for change unless a group such as the various "Tea Parties" that is truly wanting to reform the federal government somehow is given the tools through election to do so. I just hope that they don't decide to run as independents because the worse case scenario is for a repeat act of the masters of corruption and deceit that are currently within the White House and Senate.

The Republican Party is slowly but surely becoming elitist like the Democrat Party and that is not a good thing and the so called "Tea Party" is strongly against that and other forms of corruption even if they are a bit rough around the edges.

Ron Paul is OK but most of his supporters fall into the batshit crazy category. Anyway there is no chance for Paul to be noninated. Ron Paul was supposed to win Iowa; he came in third.

Tonight in New Hampshire, Ron Paul was slaughtered in a 17 point loss. New Hampshire has more libertarians than nearly any other state but Ron Paul still got slaughtered. New Hampshire is not a socially conservative state but it is fiscally conservative.

I actually think Ron Paul will do even worse in the south.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.