Both, obviously. If there's enough provisions for two, there's enough for both of them. I'd gladly sacrifice myself for either of them.
Obviously I'd sacrifice myself for *both* of them.
Family first, it is morally correct, but I would offer to ration the food. I'd hate to see either my best friend or my least favorite sibling die.
Both. We can all take turns paddling with our legs by holding onto the back outside the raft. You neglected to say how long the provisions for two would last.
Not only can provisions for two be stretched for three (just won't last as long) but with a third person along when it comes to cannibalism time there's a whole extra month of eating just wasted if left behind! And if you're being chased by sharks while still in the raft, let nature choose the weakest link!
Remember that blood is always thicker than water. And honestly, I would save my sibling even if s/he's my least favorite. But if I can, I would do my best in order to save them both.
I would save my sibling at any cost, if I am given to choose anyone between my friend and my sibling. Here, I completely agree with ai-ai. Thanks.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.