Pure statistics favored a Muslim connection. There's nothing the least bit stereotypical in that comment, either; it's simply statistics. Had the miscreants been something other than Muslim, the appropriate note would be made and the percentage favoring Muslims for the next attack would be slightly lower.
Since the U.S. has been occupying and bombing the crap out of Muslim nations for decades now. You think its o.k. For the U.S. to kill Muslim women and children with Obama's drones?
You think their families aren't going to seek the same kind of justice/revenge Americans sought after 9/11? Are you so blinded by your hatred for Muslims that you think its o.k. To slaughter thousands of innocent women and children ever since the Clinton administration?
Or are you just not that into historical facts?
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.