CXF generated WSDL doesn't contain WS-SecurityPolicy definition?

It's not supported right now Note: at this point, WS-SecurityPolicy support is ONLY available for "WSDL first" scenarios. The WS-SecurityPolicy fragments can only be pulled from WSDL. In the future, we plan to enable various code first scenarios as well, but at this time, only WSDL first is available cxf.apache.org/docs/ws-securitypolicy.html Someone explains the same problem here, and expose a solution with @Policy.

However, the solution is boggy with CXF.

It's not supported right now. Note: at this point, WS-SecurityPolicy support is ONLY available for "WSDL first" scenarios. The WS-SecurityPolicy fragments can only be pulled from WSDL.In the future, we plan to enable various code first scenarios as well, but at this time, only WSDL first is available.

cxf.apache.org/docs/ws-securitypolicy.html Someone explains the same problem here, and expose a solution with @Policy. However, the solution is boggy with CXF http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/WS-Security-policy-in-wsdl-for-java-first-approach-td569052.html The duplication problem is now fixed and will be release in 2.4.2 (see https://issues.apache. Org/jira/browse/CXF-3668).

I would like to use WS-Security to protect my web service. I'm using CXF to expose my endpoint, and use WSDL generation from Java code (aka CXF code first service). However, I'm using CXF to automatically generate the WSDL.

The generated WSDL doesn't indicate that the client should use WS-Security. I'm not using Spring, but I use an embedded Jetty.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions